@Kamil-Podlesak I think . (As far as anybody can even tell when it comes to )

This affects not the main category list, but does affect Recents, unread, and category listings...

@Tsaukpaetra At least you're not stirred.

@Buddy said in Inversion of Control with plugins?: @Tsaukpaetra said in Inversion of Control with plugins?: So, in this case, you're to include a header file that includes a struct that holds pointers to functions, which the loading executable (in this case HexChat) provides the plugin by calling a specific function in the plugin and providing it that handle to the struct. I'm interested to know how you parsed the original post to mean something other than that: @Tsaukpaetra program A has plugin compatibility. so any DLLs in a particular folder, including DLL B, get loaded at runtime and a particular exported symbol is called. This is an inverse of how DLLs are supposed to work; the program provides the library functions to the DLL instead of the other way around. This is fine on non-Windows systems, because externally-defined functions can be referenced even if you don't specify the DLL name as long as the function exists at runtime. Windows however does not have an 'amorphous blob' model of functions, and requires that you say what DLL each function comes from. This means that this plugin compatibility model is impossible in Windows. Unless of course you pass a struct to that particular exported symbol containing all your library function pointers. Which is the solution I'm currently running with. Was it the ranty interjection that threw you? If we cut that out we get @Tsaukpaetra program A has plugin compatibility. so any DLLs in a particular folder, including DLL B, get loaded at runtime and a particular exported symbol is called. you pass a struct to that particular exported symbol containing all your library function pointers. Which is the solution I'm currently running with. which to me seems to be saying the same thing as your summary above. I don't understand the question?

@ask_compu said in Forever posting...: @Tsaukpaetra it went through That it did, and it let the other one through right after. I blame websocket reconnection failure.

@Gąska said in 8 Values: @zecc said in 8 Values: I support single-payer, universal healthcare. What's that, a single person paying for everyone's healthcare? I don't want to be the one who supports that! You tried to make a joke, but the reality is exactly that - in single payer system, there is one entity that pays for everyone's medical bills - it's called the state, and it's funded entirely from taxes. Could be treasure or tribute. We don't do a lot of those these days, but all three Ts are technically on the menu.

@blakeyrat said in Help! I can't think about this thing and I need to in order to do homework!: the highest paid person I know does accounting consulting for company mergers. She also travels all over the world as part of doing due diligence (visiting all the offices, etc.) all paid by the employer. My lizard hypothesis is looking pretty good at this point.